Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Biondo Flavio's avatar

On the names of Christians point, I think Stone is over-reading what the chart proves. Two minor issues. 1) Using number of names as a proxy for social status is ok - it more or less works - but it is a proxy. Worth being a little cautious about, especially before you make big conclusions from it (e.g. very wealthy people more likely to commission a verse epitaph, but verse epitaphs much more likely to use single names). 2) The number of names people used decreased from the first to the fourth century A.D. as the number of Christians increased. This must explain some of what looks like disproportionate use of single names by Christians.

The more significant problem is that the thesis on which he is drawing is a study specifically of the Greek inscriptions at Rome. For cultural/social/historical/legal reasons single names were much more common in the Greek world, even after Caracalla's universal grant of citizenship in A.D. 212 (which theoretically entitled all free adult males to the tria nomina). So, of course you see loads of single names in a corpus of Greek inscriptions from Rome! That is probably telling you less about social status than (say) a comparable study of Latin epitaphs would.

(I am agnostic on the broader issue of Christian social status before Constantine, but I think we do have to acknowledge what the evidence does and does not help us with).

Expand full comment
Basil Chamberlain's avatar

Really fascinating round-up! I spend rather more of yesterday afternoon than I expected following those links. The paper on cousin marriage is extremely detailed and persuasive. I look forward to your take on the theme!

Expand full comment
29 more comments...

No posts