Discussion about this post

User's avatar
William H Amos's avatar

I was reading Henry Chadwick's essay on the distinctiveness of Christain Ethics this weekend past. It is important not to mis-state what it was that the Gospel brought to the philosophy and ethics of the ancient world.

The distinctiveness of Christian ethics lay not in a great Mosaic reordering of society, a new set of Laws to a people that walked in darkness. But rather “in the conception of divine grace. The characteristic stress on humility is the correlative of that” (p.271). It is naïve to think that the first preachers of the gospel “brought a brilliant light and radiant purity into the Stygian darkness of a polytheistic society, the supreme values of which were nothing but power, honour, wealth, and sex” (p.267) Personally having been gladly persuaded by the writings of Perry and Holland I feel I must defer to Prof Chadwick's superior understanding on this.

What Chirstianity brought was not a new form of 'kindness' either, as it is presented in the meliorist therapeutic churches of today but something stranger and more unnerving.

Nicolas Gomez Davila (I recommend reading his aphorisms) describes it interestingly thus :"Christianity is an impudence which we must not disguise as kindness."

He was also the thinker who first pointed out that modern, progressive Christianity has collapsed the Great Commandment into a subtle heresy - "You shall love your neighbour with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind. On this commandment hangs all the law and the prophets"

Progressivism and 'Wokery' are as much a Christian heresy as Islam is. We are forever trying to conform the Gospel to the World by trimming it's difficult and awkward aspects.

We love our neighbour for God's sake. Not for his own.

Gerry Box's avatar

A really interesting piece Ed, offering a thought provoking analysis. It really highlights what we have lost. Thank you.

60 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?