Discussion about this post

User's avatar
A. N. Owen's avatar

Harsh! But I see where you come from. I'm sure you did read NS Lyons' latest essay and I grabbed this snippet from it:

"...national identities are not actually produced out of sharing bank holidays and a love of fish and chips, but from the evolution of deep historical attachments, mutual loyalties, consciously transmitted cultural and religious traditions, and almost always a stable, single majority group “whose cultural dominance is plain and unquestioned” enough to ensure minority cultures either willingly remain minority cultures or willingly integrate into the majority over time. In other words nations can’t be socially constructed (out of a new, fabricated social contract) at all, but are the organic amalgamations of a lengthy shared history of living together. This means a mild, patched-together “liberal nationalism” is unlikely to ever go very far in generating a significant level of cohesion or community."

It does seem like what is left is just mere memories of national identities, and so watered down to be as inclusive, ie "safe" aka offending the least. The Disneyfication of the monarchy is the disneyfication of national identities. A bout of tweeism wouldn't be problematic if people were supremely confident in other areas of cultural life, but we know that is not the case, and it makes the tweeism of the celebrations a bit sad in retrospect.

Expand full comment
Mike Hind's avatar

Look, what we need is a new Cool Britannia but WHERE ARE THE NEW OASIS AND BLUR and that wonderful Olympic opening ceremony too, eh. That made you soooo proud and when that Mo Farah won things for Britain and he was a refugee you know. And everyone knows that if you don’t want forrins for neighbours you can’t spell.

Loved this piece, Mr W. It was painful to read because I have been the milquetoast you describe. Before noticing what absolute tw*ts we on the softish leftish had become.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts