Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John's avatar

Ed's articles are always worth a second read.

We’re muggles, not wizards. Conservatism, in my mind, means creating a society that is most pleasant for ‘the average man’, while modern progressivism is focused on the exceptional and unusual, who are both disproportionately found among people in the media, and among hard-luck cases caught up by otherwise good systems.

A big disadvantage is that modern conservatism is, by definition, a sort of agnosticism. It’s oppositional. Progressivism offers a vision, a moral certainty; it asserts that its worldview is the correct one, and that people who disagree are fundamentally bad people; it invents and popularises morally-loaded terms with an impressive prolificacy. This is what many of us dislike about the post-new Left, but it’s attractive to vast numbers of people who fall into line.

Which got me thinking that a disadvantage for conservatism is that it seeks to preserve a social order against the natural tendency of all systems to tend towards entropy. A house quickly falls into a state of general disorder if one avoids the effort of cleaning and tidying it etc. And humans will tend to avoid that because (a) cleaning and tidying takes effort; and (b) the making of that effort does not feed the ego. In contrast progressivism tells people that to clean the house is to both submit to oppression and to thwart self realisation (which in old money is just feeding the ego). Ironically, if England win the Euros it will be because they submitted to a SINGLE culture of rules and discipline. But that’s not going to be the story, is it?

Expand full comment
Aidan Barrett's avatar

Speaking of Indian movies distaining un-feminine women, there is actually a stock character called "crazy girl" used in Tamil cinema: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loosu_ponnu

Expand full comment
27 more comments...

No posts